Journal of Contemporary Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2014 ) > List of Articles


Comparison of Calcium Sulfate and Bovine Collagen Barriers for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation

Robert Spears, Ibtisam Al-Hashimi, Eric S Solomon, David G Kerns, William W Hallmon, Harvey P Kessler, Matthew L Heaton

Citation Information : Spears R, Al-Hashimi I, Solomon ES, Kerns DG, Hallmon WW, Kessler HP, Heaton ML. Comparison of Calcium Sulfate and Bovine Collagen Barriers for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation. J Contemp Dent 2014; 4 (3):129-138.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10031-1083

License: CC BY-ND 3.0

Published Online: 00-12-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


PDF Share
  1. Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes. J Periodontol 1998;69(9):1044-1049.
  2. Treatment options following single-rooted tooth removal: a literature review and proposed hierarchy of treatment selection. J Periodontol 2005;76(5):821-831.
  3. Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol 2003;74(7):990-999.
  4. Alveolar ridge preservation following extraction of maxillary anterior teeth. Report on 23 consecutive cases. J Periodontol 1996;67(4):390-395.
  5. Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1(1):22-32.
  6. Localized ridge augmentation using absorbable pins and e-PTFE barrier membranes: a new surgical technique. Case reports. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1994;14(1):48-61.
  7. Horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and the guided bone regeneration technique with collagen membranes: a clinical study with 42 patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17(4):359-366.
  8. Localized ridge augmentation/ preservation: a systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8(1):321-327.
  9. Histologic and radiographic evidence of vertical ridge augmentation utilizing distraction osteogenesis: 10 consecutively placed distractors. J Periodontol 2001;72(12):1767-1779.
  10. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis for bone augmentation of severely atrophic ridges in 10 consecutive cases: a histologic and histomorphometric study. J Periodontol 2007;78(2):360-366.
  11. A feasibility study evaluating rhBMP-2/absorbable collagen sponge device for local alveolar ridge preservation or augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17(2):124-139.
  12. Evaluation of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in oral applications including the use of endosseous implants: 3-year results of a pilot study in humans. J Periodontol 2000;71(8):1241-1257.
  13. Collagen membranes: a review. J Periodontol 2001;72(2):215-229.
  14. Periodontal regeneration. J Periodontol 2005;76(9):1601-1622.
  15. Guided tissue regeneration. Absorbable barriers. Dent Clin North Am 1998;42(3):505-522.
  16. Postoperative healing complications associated with gore-tex periodontal material. Part II. Effect of complications on regeneration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1995;15(6):548-561.
  17. Postoperative healing complications associated with gore-tex periodontal material. Part I. Incidence and characterization. Int J Periodon Restorative Dent 1995;15(4):363-375.
  18. The effect of membrane exposure on the outcome of regenerative procedures in humans: a meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2001;72(4):512-516.
  19. Histological assessment of augmented jaw bone utilizing a new collagen barrier membrane compared to a standard barrier membrane to protect a granular bone substitute material. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13(6):587-594.
  20. Observations on a new collagen barrier membrane in 16 consecutively treated patients. Clinical and histological findings. J Periodontol 2001;72(11):1616-1623.
  21. Different crosslinked types of collagen implanted in rat palatal gingiva. J Periodontol 1989;6(1):35-43.
  22. Periodontal regeneration of human intrabony defects with bioresorbable membranes: a controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol 1996;67(3):217-223.
  23. A clinical comparison of collagen membranes with e-PTFE membranes in the treatment of human mandibular buccal class II furcation defects. J Periodontol 1993;64(10):925-933.
  24. Histologic analysis of alveolar bone following guided bone regeneration. J Periodontol 2004;75(5):750-756.
  25. Calcium sulfate: a biodegradable and biocompatible barrier for guided tissue regeneration. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1992;8:226-234.
  26. Comparison of calcium sulfate and autogenous bone graft to bioabsorbable membranes plus autogenous bone graft in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects: a split-mouth study. J Periodontol 2001;72(3):296-302.
  27. The use of plaster of Paris to fill large defects in bone: a preliminary report 1959. Clin Orthop 2001;382:3-5.
  28. Healing of large defects treated with calcium sulfate pellets containing demineralized bone matrix particles. Orthopedics 2003;26(5 suppl):s581-s585.
  29. Migration of human gingival fibroblasts over guided tissue regeneration barrier materials. J Periodontol 1996;67(3):236-244.
  30. Aesthetic extractions with calcium sulfate and the principles of guided tissue regeneration. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1993;5(5):61-69.
  31. Bone regeneration with calcium sulfate: evidence for increased angiogenesis in rabbits. J Oral Implant 2002;28:273-278.
  32. Comparison of an allograft in an experimental putty carrier and a bovine-derived xenograft used in ridge preservation: a clinical and histologic study in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(4):491-497.
  33. Medical grade calcium sulfate hemihydrate in healing of human extraction sockets: clinical and histological observations at 3 months. J Periodontol 2004;75(6):902-908.
  34. Augmentation of the maxillary sinus with calcium sulfate: one-year clinical report from a prospective longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14(3):869-878.
  35. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) using membranes and calcium sulphate after apicectomy: a comparative histomorphometrical study. Int Endod J 2002;35(9):255-263.
  36. Bone graft substitutes: a comparative qualitative histologic review of current osteoconductive grafting materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16(1):105-114.
  37. The use of calcium sulphate in the surgical treatment of a through and through periradicular lesion. Int Endod J 2001;34(3):189-197.
  38. Distraction osteogenesis versus autogenous onlay grafting. Part II: biology of regenerate and onlay bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21(2):237-244.
  39. The longterm efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1(1):11-25.
  40. Biodegradation of differently cross-linked collagen membranes: an experimental study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16(3):369-378.
  41. Repair following treatment of circumferential periodontal defects in dogs with collagen and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier membranes. J Periodontol 1996;67(4):403-413.
  42. Osteoblast adherence and resorption activity of isolated osteoclasts on calxium sulphate hemihydrate. Biomaterials 1995;16(17):1327-1332.
  43. Localized ridge augmentation in dogs: a pilot study using membranes and hydroxyapatite. J Periodontol 1990;61(3):157-165.
  44. A new approach to regeneration of surgically reduced alveolar ridges in dogs: a clinical and histologic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10(5):537-551.
  45. Evaluation of a prototype trilayer membrane (PTLM) for lateral ridge augmentation: an experimental study in the canine mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31(2):190-199.
  46. Guided bone regeneration of large mandibular defects in a primate model. J Periodontol 2000;71(9):1484-1491.
  47. Lateral ridge augmentation using different bone fillers and barrier membrane application. A histologic and histomorphometric pilot study in the canine mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12(3):260-269.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.