Journal of Contemporary Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2020 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Prevalence of Third Molar Agenesis in Patients—A Panoramic Retrospective Study

Vivek Padmanabhan, Omar Khaled AR Abo Mostafa, Lama M Kamel Rahhal

Keywords : Agenesis, Orthopantomograms, Third molars

Citation Information : Padmanabhan V, Mostafa OK, Rahhal LM. Prevalence of Third Molar Agenesis in Patients—A Panoramic Retrospective Study. J Contemp Dent 2020; 10 (1):9-12.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10031-1301

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 12-08-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Background/purpose: The most common developmental dental problem is that of agenesis. It is seen to affect around about 25% of the population. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of agenesis of third molars in patients visiting a dental college in the UAE. Materials and methods: Orthopantomograms (OPGs) of 945 dental patients aged 6–30 years were evaluated for bilateral agenesis or congenitally missing teeth. Bilateral agenesis was considered and unilateral missing teeth were excluded from the study. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the percentages and frequencies were calculated using Chi-square test and the level of significance was considered if the p value was <0.05. Results: Eighty-five of the 945 OPGs showed bilateral agenesis. The prevalence of bilateral agenesis or congenitally missing third molars within the selected 85 OPGs was at 31.76%. Conclusions: The prevalence rate of bilateral agenesis or congenitally missing permanent third molars is high at 31.76%.


PDF Share
  1. Kokich VO Jr, Kinzer GA. Managing congenitally missing lateral incisors Part II: tooth-supported restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17(2):76–84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00089.x.
  2. Abu-Hussein M, Watted N, Azzaldeen A, et al. Prevalence of missing lateral incisor agenesis in an orthodontic Arabs population in Israel (Arab48). Int J Public Health Res 2015;3(3):101–107. DOI: 10.15761/ohc.1000106.
  3. Pitekova L, Satko I. Controversy of third molars. Bratisl Lek Listy 2009;110(2):110–111. PMID: 19408843.
  4. Kaur B, Sheikh S, Pallagatti S. Radiographic assessment of agenesis of third molars and para-radicular third molar radiolucencies in population of age group 18–25 years old – a radiographic survey. Arch Oral Res 2012;8(1):13–18.
  5. Bindayel NA. The role of third molar in orthodontic treatment. Pak Oral Dent J 2011;31:374–378. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.342.14804.
  6. Hentisz AY. Radiographic study of third molar agenesis in a sample from the American Midsouth [Master's thesis]. University of Tennessee; 2003.
  7. Larmour C, Mossey PA, Thind BS, et al. Hypodontia – a retrospective review of prevalence and etiology. Part I. Quintessence Int 2005;36(4):263–270. PMID: 15835422.
  8. Vahid-Dastjerdi E, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Mahdian M, et al. Non-syndromic hypodontia in an Iranian orthodontic population. J Oral Sci 2010;52(3):455–461. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.52.455.
  9. De Coster PJ, Marks LA, Martens LC, et al. Dental agenesis: genetic and clinical perspectives. J Oral Pathol Med 2009;38(1):1–7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2008.00699.x.
  10. Polder BJ, Van't Hof MA, Van der Linden FP, et al. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32(3):217–226. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00158.x.
  11. Shinn DL. Congenitally missing third molars in a British population. J Dent 1976;4(1): 42–44. DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(76)90069-5.
  12. Garcia-Hernandez F, Toro Yagui O, Vega Vidal M, et al. Third molar agenesis in young people between 14 and 20 years of age, Antofagasta, Chile. Int J Morphol 2008;26(4):825–832. DOI: 10.4067/s0717-95022008000400008.
  13. Lee SH, Lee JY, Park HK, et al. Development of third molars in Korean juveniles and adolescents. Forensic Sci Int 2009;188(1–3)107–111. PMID: 19410395. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.03.033.
  14. Haralabakis H. Observation on the time of eruption, congenital absence and impaction of the third molar teeth. Tans Eur Orthod Soc 1957;33:308–312.
  15. Byahatti S, Ingafou MS. Prevalence of eruption status of third molars in Libyan students. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012;9(2):152–157. DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.95228.
  16. Singh N, Chaudhari S, Chaudhari R, et al. A radiographic survey of agenesis of the third molar: a panoramic study. J Forensic Dent Sci 2017;9(3):130–134. DOI: 10.4103/jfo.jfds_59_16.
  17. Nanda RS, Chawla TN. Status of third molar teeth. J Dent Assoc 1959;31(2):19–29.
  18. Kapadia H, Mues G, D'Souza R. Genes affecting tooth morphogenesis. Orthod Craniofac Res 2007;10(3):105–113. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2007.00395.x.
  19. Lynham A. Panoramic, radiographic survey of hypodontia of Australian defense forces recruits. Austr Dent J 1989;35(1):19–22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1990.tb03021.x.
  20. Mueroma H, Turtola L, Ylipaavalnielmi P, et al. Status of the third molars in the 20 to 21 year old Finish University population. J Am Coll Health 1985;34(3):127–129. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.1985. 9939622.
  21. Sujon MK, Alam MK, Rahman SA. Prevalence of third molar agenesis: associated dental anomalies in non-syndromic 5923 patients. PLoS One 2016;11(8):e0162070. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162070.
  22. Graber IW. Congenital absence of teeth: a review with emphasis on inheritance patterns. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;96(2):266–275. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1978.0054.
  23. Backman B, Wahlin YB. Variations in number and morphology of permanent teeth in 7 year old Swedish children. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001;11:11–17.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.