Journal of Contemporary Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2019 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Inclusion of Cotton Fabric in a Package of Metal Instruments Retained Intrapackage Humidity after Steam Sterilization

Kanisa Chantarothorn, Nattakarn Narongchai, Apisara Trairattanapa, Chompoonuch Wongwiriya, Ruchanee S Ampornaramveth

Keywords : Autoclave, Cotton fabric, Humidity, Steam sterilization, Temperature, Wet packs

Citation Information : Chantarothorn K, Narongchai N, Trairattanapa A, Wongwiriya C, Ampornaramveth RS. Inclusion of Cotton Fabric in a Package of Metal Instruments Retained Intrapackage Humidity after Steam Sterilization. J Contemp Dent 2019; 9 (2):64-67.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10031-1255

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-08-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: Packages that are wet after steam sterilization are identified as a failure in the sterilization process. The objective was to investigate whether different fabric loads and packaging materials affect temperature and humidity inside the packages after steam sterilization. Materials and methods: Four groups of instrument packages containing either metal instruments alone or various types of fabric load (cotton, towel, or a combination) were prepared with three different packaging materials (cotton fabric, nonwoven material, or paper-film). The packages were then subjected to a full cycle steam sterilization at 121°C for 20 minutes. Percent humidity and temperature were determined immediately after removal of the package from the sterilizing chamber, and after every 15 minutes to 1 hour. Results: The presence of any fabric inside the packages significantly increased intrapackage humidity immediately after removal from the sterilizing chamber. Intrapackage humidity dropped sharply in the packages containing metal alone or towel. The presence of cotton fabric inside the packages retained higher intrapackage humidity at every time point. The packages with metal alone had a significantly lower temperature compared with the other three groups when measured immediately. Intrapackage temperature gradually decreased in time. There was no difference in temperature between the groups from 15 minutes. The packages wrapped in cotton fabric significantly retained immediate intrapackage humidity compared with nonwoven materials or paper-film pouch. Conclusion: Packages containing cotton fabric retained intrapackage humidity; and this may cause sterilization failure. Clinical significance: Our data provided evidence to support that cotton fabric should not be included in the package of metal instruments for steam sterilization in routine dental instrument processing protocols.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Dion M, Parker W. Steam sterilization principles. Pharm Eng 2013;33(6):1–8.
  2. STERIS. Preparation and Packaging Best Practices Wet Pack Problem Solving Guide; 2014. p. 3.
  3. Bruna CQ, Graziano KU. Temperature and humidity in the storage area of sterile materials: a literature review. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2012;46(5):1215–1220. DOI: 10.1590/s0080-62342012000500025.
  4. Rutala WA, Weber DJ, the HICPAC. Guideline for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities, 2008-centers for disease control. 2017; 1–161.
  5. Conner R, Spry C. Comprehensive guide to steam sterilization and sterility assurance in health care facilities. ANSI/AAMI ST79:2017; 2017.
  6. Thailand CSSA of Thailand CSSA Guidelines for Disinfection and Sterilization of Medical Devices; 2018. p. 61.
  7. Dai X-Q, Imamura R, Liu G-L, et al. Effect of moisture transport on microclimate under T-shirts. Eur J Appl Physiol 2008;104(2):337–340. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-007-0628-z.
  8. Zhu G, Militky J, Wang Y, et al. Study on the wicking property of cotton fabric. Fibres Text East Eur 2015;23(2):137–140.
  9. Su C-I, Fang J-X, Chen X-H, et al. Moisture absorption and release of profiled polyester and cotton composite knitted fabrics. Text Res J 2007;77(10):764–769.
  10. Miller CH. Infection control and the management of hazardous materials for the dental team, 6th ed., 2017. p. 120.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.