Journal of Contemporary Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2019 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Assessment of Anterior Dentoalveolar Dimensions in Yemeni Population with Different Skeletal Patterns

Talat H Al-Gunaid

Keywords : Dentoalveolar dimensions, Skeletal patterns, Yemenis

Citation Information : Al-Gunaid TH. Assessment of Anterior Dentoalveolar Dimensions in Yemeni Population with Different Skeletal Patterns. J Contemp Dent 2019; 9 (2):59-63.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10031-1256

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-08-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to identify the mean anterior dentoalveolar dimensions of the Yemeni population, identifying possible gender differences and comparing maxillary and mandibular anterior dentoalveolar sizes across short-, average- and long-face groups. Materials and methods: This study comprised of taking cephalometric radiographs of 82 subjects (42 male, 40 female) with a mean age of 21.9 ± 2.8 years. The sample was divided into three groups: short-face group: FMA <25°; average-face group: FMA ≥25° to <30°, and long-face group: FMA ≥30°. Eight angular and seven linear measurements were taken and compared between the groups. Results: Significant gender differences between men and women were found in the mandibular dentoalveolar dimensions. In the short-face group, the maxillary upper dentoalveolar length and height was lower than the average-face group. Additionally, the ANB angle was the most pronounced parameter to be correlated with the anterior dentoalveolar dimensions, followed by FMA angle. Conclusion: The results of this study could act as a useful clinical instrument for orthodontic practice in Yemen. Understanding the association between sagittal and vertical relations with anterior dentoalveolar dimensions is essential in achieving optimal anteroposterior orthodontic tooth movement in cases with different sagittal and vertical jaw relationships.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Aasen TO, Espeland L. An approach to maintain orthodontic alignment of lower incisors without the use of retainers. Eur J Orthod 2005;27(3):209–214. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cji012.
  2. Richmond S, Klufas ML, Sywanyk M. Assessing incisor inclination: a non-invasive technique. Eur J Orthod 1998;20(6):721–726. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/20.6.721.
  3. Zubaidi SH, Al, Alfakhry HHS. Anterior alveolar dimensions for class I normal occlusion and class II malocclusion of Iraqi adults. Int J Enhanc Res Sci Technol Eng 2018;7(6):51–57.
  4. Edwards JG. A study of the anterior portion of the palate as it relates to orthodontic therapy. Am J Orthod 1976;69(3):249–273. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(76)90075-0.
  5. Wonglamsam P, Manosudprasit M, Godfrey K. Facio-lingual width of the alveolar base. Aust Orthod J 2003;19(1):1–11.
  6. Bills DA, Handelman CS, BeGole EA. Bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: traits and orthodontic correction. Angle Orthod 2005; 75(3):333–339. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[333:BDPTAO]2.0.CO;2.
  7. Beckmann SH, Kuitert RB, Prahl-Andersen B, et al. Alveolar and skeletal dimensions associated with overbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113(4):443–452.
  8. Lopez-Gavito G, Wallen TR, Little RM, et al. Anterior open-bite malocclusion: a longitudinal 10-year postretention evaluation of orthodontically treated patients. Am J Orthod 1985;87(3):175–186. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90038-7.
  9. Lowe AA. Correlations between orofacial muscle activity and craniofacial morphology in a sample of control and anterior open-bite subjects. Am J Orthod 1980;78(1):89–98. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90042-1.
  10. Nahoum HI, Horowitz SL, Benedicto EA. Varieties of anterior open-bite. Am J Orthod 1972;61(5):486–492. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(72)90153-4.
  11. Weinbach JR, Smith RJ. Cephalometric changes during treatment with the open bite bionator. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101(4):367–374. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80330-0.
  12. Mangla R, Dua V, Khanna M, et al. Evaluation of mandibular morphology in different facial types. Contemp Clin Dent 2011;2(3):200. DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.86458.
  13. AlHadlaq A. Anterior alveolar dimensions among different classifications of sagittal jaw relationship in Saudi subjects. Saudi Dent J 2010;22(2):69–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2010.02.004.
  14. Vitchuyanon H. Anterior dentoalveolar bone width, height and length in orthodontic patients with various vertical skeletal patterns. Master thesis. Mahidol University, Thailand; 2005.
  15. Al-Zubaidi SH, Obaidi HAA. The variation of the lower anterior facial height and its component parameters among the three over bite relationships (Cephalometric study). Al-Rafidain Dent J 2006;6(2): 106–113.
  16. Ellis E, McNamara JA, Lawrence TM. Components of adult class II open-bite malocclusion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985;43(2):92–105. DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(85)90055-2.
  17. Frost DE, Fonseca RJ, Turvey TA, et al. Cephalometric diagnosis and surgical-orthodontic correction of apertognathia. Am J Orthod 1980;78(6):657–669. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90205-5.
  18. Nanda SK. Morphology of the human chin from cephalometric measurements. J Dent Res 1965;44(4):828–828. DOI: 10.1177/00220345650440043601.
  19. Tanaka R, Suzuki H, Maeda H, et al. Relationship between an inclination of mandibular plane and a morphology of symphysis. Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi 1989;48(1):7–20.
  20. Sadek MM, Sabet NE, Hassan IT. Alveolar bone mapping in subjects with different vertical facial dimensions. Eur J Orthod 2014;37(2): 194–201. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cju034.
  21. Hoang N, Nelson G, Hatcher D, et al. Evaluation of mandibular anterior alveolus in different skeletal patterns. Prog Orthod 2016;17(1):22. DOI: 10.1186/s40510-016-0135-z.
  22. Ceylan I, Yavuz I, Arslan F. The effects of overjet on dentoalveolar compensation. Eur J Orthod 2003;25(3):325–330. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/25.3.325.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.