Muscular, functional and orthodontic changes in pre-school children with enlarged adenoids and tonsils. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngal 2003 Jul;67(7):761-770.
The effectiveness of treatment of Class II malocclusion with the twin block appliance: a randomised, controlled trial. Part 2: psychological effects. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003 Nov;124(5):488-495.
The use of myofunctional appliances in the UK: a survey of British orthodontists. Dent Update 1998 Sep;25(7):302-308.
The final length of the mandible: is it genetically determined? In: Carlson DS, editor. Craniofacial biology. Monograph No. 10. Ann Arbor (MI): Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan; 1981. p. 105-126.
Oral habits and their management. In: Textbook of orthodontics. 2nd ed. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Pvt Ltd. p. 581-612.
Prevalence of oral habit in 11-13 year-old school children in Gulbarga city, India. Virtual J Orthod 2009;8(3):1-4.
The effect of a modified functional appliance on obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988 Nov;94(5):384-392.
Influence of mandibular protruding device on airway passage and dentofacial characteristics in obstructive sleep apnea and snoring. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002 Oct;122(4):371-379.
The twin block traction technique. Eur J Orthod 1982 May;4(2):129-138.
The twin block technique. A functional orthopaedic appliance system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988 Jan;93(1):1-18.
Class II malocclusion treatment using combined twin block and fixed orthodontic appliances – a case report. Saudi Dent J 2011 Jan;23(1):43-51.
A comparison of twin block, Andresen and removable appliances in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Funct Orthod 1992 Jul-Aug;9(4):26-31.
Cephalometric evaluation of the twin-block appliance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with matched normative growth data. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000 Jan;117(1):54-59.
