Journal of Contemporary Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2016 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Correction of Skeletal Sagittal Dysplasia using Twin Block Traction Technique

VK Ravindranath, Sachin Doshi, Prateek Navratan Daga

Citation Information : Ravindranath V, Doshi S, Daga PN. Correction of Skeletal Sagittal Dysplasia using Twin Block Traction Technique. J Contemp Dent 2016; 6 (1):75-79.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10031-1146

License: CC BY-ND 3.0

Published Online: 01-04-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; The Author(s).


Abstract

PDF Share
  1. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1998;13(2):97-106.
  2. Prevalence of malocclusion among adolescents in central Anatolia. Eur J Dent 2007 Jul;1(3):125-131.
  3. The pattern of malocclusion in a sample of orthodontic patients from Turkey. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010 Sep 1;15(5):e791-e796.
  4. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age. Angle Orthod 1981 Jul;51(3):177-202.
  5. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 2006 Jul;76(4):666-672.
  6. Class II nonextraction patients treated with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device versus intermaxillary elastics. Angle Orthod 2008 Mar;78(2):332-338.
  7. Evaluation of the immediate dentofacial changes in late adolescent patients treated with the Forsus FRD. Eur J Dent 2011 Oct;5(4):423-432.
  8. A cephalometric comparative study of class II correction with Sabbagh Universal Spring (SUS(2)) and Forsus FRD appliances. Eur J Dent 2012 Jul;6(3):302-310.
  9. Diagnosis and management of malocclusion and dentofacial deformities. 2nd ed. 2013.
  10. The twin block traction technique. Eur J Orthod 1982 May;4(2):129-138.
  11. The twin block technique. A functional orthopedic appliance system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988 Jan;93(1):1-18.
  12. class II malocclusion treatment using combined Twin Block and fixed orthodontic appliances: a case report. Saudi Dent J 2011 Jan;23(1):43-51.
  13. A comparison of twin block, Andresen and removable appliances in the treatment of class II Division 1 malocclusion. Funct Orthod 1992 Jul-Aug;9(4):26-31.
  14. Cephalometric evaluation of the Twin-block appliance in the treatment of class II Division 1 malocclusion with matched normative growth data. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000 Jan;117(1):54-59.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.