Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1998;13(2):97-106.
Prevalence of malocclusion among adolescents in central Anatolia. Eur J Dent 2007 Jul;1(3):125-131.
The pattern of malocclusion in a sample of orthodontic patients from Turkey. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010 Sep 1;15(5):e791-e796.
Components of class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age. Angle Orthod 1981 Jul;51(3):177-202.
Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 2006 Jul;76(4):666-672.
Class II nonextraction patients treated with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device versus intermaxillary elastics. Angle Orthod 2008 Mar;78(2):332-338.
Evaluation of the immediate dentofacial changes in late adolescent patients treated with the Forsus FRD. Eur J Dent 2011 Oct;5(4):423-432.
A cephalometric comparative study of class II correction with Sabbagh Universal Spring (SUS(2)) and Forsus FRD appliances. Eur J Dent 2012 Jul;6(3):302-310.
Diagnosis and management of malocclusion and dentofacial deformities. 2nd ed. 2013.
The twin block traction technique. Eur J Orthod 1982 May;4(2):129-138.
The twin block technique. A functional orthopedic appliance system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988 Jan;93(1):1-18.
class II malocclusion treatment using combined Twin Block and fixed orthodontic appliances: a case report. Saudi Dent J 2011 Jan;23(1):43-51.
A comparison of twin block, Andresen and removable appliances in the treatment of class II Division 1 malocclusion. Funct Orthod 1992 Jul-Aug;9(4):26-31.
Cephalometric evaluation of the Twin-block appliance in the treatment of class II Division 1 malocclusion with matched normative growth data. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000 Jan;117(1):54-59.
