Journal of Contemporary Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2016 ) > List of Articles


Frictional Characteristics of the Newer Low-friction Elastomeric Ligatures

Amol Mhatre, VK Ravindranath, Sachin Doshi, Girish Karandikar, PS Vivek

Citation Information : Mhatre A, Ravindranath V, Doshi S, Karandikar G, Vivek P. Frictional Characteristics of the Newer Low-friction Elastomeric Ligatures. J Contemp Dent 2016; 6 (1):19-23.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10031-1137

License: CC BY-ND 3.0

Published Online: 01-12-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; The Author(s).


PDF Share
  1. Friction and resistance to sliding in orthodontics: a critical review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2009 Apr;135(4):442-447.
  2. Friction: an overview. Semin Orthod 2003; 9(4):218-222.
  3. The effect of the ligature on the friction between bracket and archwire. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1990 Apr;51(2):106-116.
  4. A comparative study of frictional forces. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991 Dec;100(6):513-522.
  5. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires in the buccal segments. Angle Orthod 1996;66(3):215-222.
  6. The effect of ligation method on friction in sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003 Apr;123(4):416-422.
  7. Effects of ligation type and method on the resistance to sliding of novel orthodontic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states. Angle Orthod 2003;73:428-430.
  8. Friction of orthodontic elastomeric ligatures with different dimensions. Angle Orthod 2005 May;75(3):421-425.
  9. A comparison of different ligation methods on friction. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006 Nov;130(5):666-670.
  10. In vitro evaluation of frictional resistance between brackets with passive-ligation designs. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007 Jun;131(6):704.e11-22.
  11. Forces in the presence of ceramic vs stainless steel brackets with unconventional vs conventional ligatures. Angle Orthod 2008 Jan;78(1): 120-124.
  12. A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of preadjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures. Eur J Orthod 1998 Oct;20(5);589-596.
  13. Frictional evaluations of dental typodont models using four self-ligating designs and a conventional design. Angle Orthod 2005 Jan;75(1):75-85.
  14. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model. Angle Orthod 2005 Nov;75(6):1041-1045.
  15. Role of lubricants on friction between self-ligating brackets and archwires. Angle Orthod 2014 Nov;84(6):1049-1053.
  16. Friction produced by types of elastomeric ligatures in treatment mechanics with the preadjusted appliance. Angle Orthod 2006 Mar;76(2):211-216.
  17. Friction between archwires of different sizes, cross section and alloy and brackets ligated with low-friction or conventional ligatures. Angle Orthod 2009 Jan;79(1):111-116.
  18. Comparison of friction among low-friction ligation, conventional ligation and self-ligation with conventionalstainless steel and esthetic brackets: an in vitro study. J Orofac Res 2014 Oct-Dec;4(4):198-208.
  19. Frictional characteristics of the newer orthodontic elastomeric ligatures. Ind J Dent Res 2011 Jan-Feb;22(1):95-99.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.