A Comparative Study of Reliability and Accuracy of Manual and Digital Lateral Cephalometric Tracing
Amol Mhatre, VK Ravindranath, Girish Karandikar, Alok Rajendra Shah
Citation Information :
Mhatre A, Ravindranath V, Karandikar G, Shah AR. A Comparative Study of Reliability and Accuracy of Manual and Digital Lateral Cephalometric Tracing. J Contemp Dent 2016; 6 (1):15-18.
A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931 Apr;1(2):45-66.
Comparative study between manual and digital cephalometric tracing using Dolphin Imaging software with lateral radiographs. Dental Press J Orthod 2010 Nov-Dec;15(6):123-130.
Comparison of measurements from photographed lateral cephalograms and scanned cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007 Dec;132(6):830-833.
The reliability of head film measurements landmark identification. Am J Orthod 1971 Aug; 60(2):111-127.
A comparison of traditional and computerized methods of cephalometric analysis. Eur J Orthod 1981;3(1): 15-20.
An evaluation of the reproducibility of landmark identification using scanned cephalometric images. J Orthod 2001 Sep;28(3):221-229.
Digital imaging of cephalometric radiology: advantages and limitation of digital imaging (Part I). Angle Orthod 1996;66:37-42.
A comparison of conventional and digital cephalometric methods and cephalometrics analysis software: hard tissue (1). Semin Orthod 2004;10(3):204-211.
The clinical significance of tracing error in cephalometry. Br J Orthod 1974 Apr;1(3):95-101.
The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry. Angle Orthod 2004 Apr;74(2):155-161.
Landmark identification on direct digital versus film-based cephalometric radiographs: a human skull study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2002 Dec;122(6):635-642.
