Comparative Evaluation of Microroughness created on Titanium Alloy for use in Dental Implants subjected to Two Different Acid Etching Techniques: An in vitro Study
Vishwas Madaan, Ashvini M Padhye, Manjeet Mapara
Citation Information :
Madaan V, Padhye AM, Mapara M. Comparative Evaluation of Microroughness created on Titanium Alloy for use in Dental Implants subjected to Two Different Acid Etching Techniques: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent 2016; 6 (1):1-8.
Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983 Sep;50(3):399-410.
Osseo integrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long lasting, direct bone to implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52(2):155-170.
A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periodontol 1999;70:12.
Materials characteristics of uncoated/ceramiccoated implant materials. Adv Dent Res 1997 Jun;13:21-26.
Biomimetic dental implants–new ways to enhance osseointegration. J Can Dent Assoc 2002 May;68(5):286-288.
Surface modifications of dental implants. Aus Dent J 2008 Jun;53(Suppl 1):S26-S33.
Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 2007 Jul;23(7):844-854.
Bone contact around acid etched implants: a histological and histomorphometric evaluation of human-retrieved implants. J Oral Impalntol 2003;29(1):13-18.
Oxidized titanium implants (Nobel Biocare TiUnite) compared with turned titanium implants (Nobel Biocare Mark III) with respect to failure in a v of consecutive patients treated with early functional loading and two stage protocol. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16(3):308-312.
Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminium oxide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996 Jan-Feb;11(1):38-45.
Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998 Sep-Oct;11(5):391-401.
A human histologic analysis of osseotite and machined surface using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999 Apr;19(2):117-129.
Surface modifications for endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Implantol Clin Res 2012;3(3):116-121.
Importance of implant surface preparation for biomaterials with different intrinsic properties. Tissue integration in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction. Steenberghe D, Albrektsson T, Brånemark. PI, editors. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica; 1985. p. 13-40.
A pilot study comparing screw-shaped implants. Surface analysis and histologic evaluation of bone healing. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996 Dec;7(4):397-404.
Attachment of bone to threated implants by ingrowth and mechanical interlocking. J Biomed Mater Res 1972 Sep;6(5):401-412.
Review basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009 Feb;88(2):579-596.
Rate of pull-out strength gain of dual-etched titanium implants: a comparative study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999 Sep-Oct;14(5):722-728.
Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991 Jul;25(7):889-902.