Journal of Contemporary Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

A Comparative Evaluation of Stress Distribution by Three Different Designs of Prefabricated Metal Posts on Endodontically Treated Permanent Maxillary Central Incisor: A Three-dimensional Finite Element Study

Jyoti Nadgere, Ganesh Pandurang Mengal

Citation Information : Nadgere J, Mengal GP. A Comparative Evaluation of Stress Distribution by Three Different Designs of Prefabricated Metal Posts on Endodontically Treated Permanent Maxillary Central Incisor: A Three-dimensional Finite Element Study. J Contemp Dent 2015; 5 (3):123-130.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10031-1121

License: CC BY-ND 3.0

Published Online: 01-12-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; The Author(s).


Abstract

PDF Share
  1. Posts and cores: state of the art. JADA 1998; 129(1):96-97.
  2. Restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores: a review. Quintessence Int 2005;36(9):737-746.
  3. Esthetic and functional consideration in restoring endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin N Am 2011;55(2):403-410.
  4. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1960; 46(10):721-735.
  5. Photoelastic analysis of post core restorations. Aus Den J 1977;22(3):157-159.
  6. Angulation loading effects on cast-gold endodontic posts: a photoelastic stress analysis. J Prosthet Dent 1983;51(4):509-514.
  7. Photoelastic analysis of stress transfer by endodontically treated teeth to the supporting structure using different restorative techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61(5):535-543.
  8. Effects of post placement on endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62(2): 166-172.
  9. Stress distribution surrounding endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64(4):412-418.
  10. Stress analysis of five prefabricated endodontic dowel designs: a photoelastic study. J Oper Dent 1992;17(3):86-92.
  11. Determination of stress patterns in root-filled teeth incorporating various dowel Designs. J Dent Res 1981;60(7):1301-1310.
  12. Stress analysis of a tooth restored with a post and core. J Dent Rest 1983;62(6): 760-763.
  13. Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis). J Endodont 2002;28(9): 229-233.
  14. Stress analysis of an upper central incisor restored with different posts. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30(9):936-943.
  15. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated dowel-restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94(4):321-329.
  16. The stress evaluation of root posts using the finite element analysis. RSBO 2011; 8(2):189-193.
  17. The effect of three post and core systems on the stress distribution in endodontically treated teeth: a two dimensional finite element analysis. J Adv Dent Res 2011;2(1):41-49.
  18. Stress Analysis of a maxillary central incisor restored with different posts. Eur J Dent 2007;1(2): 67-71.
  19. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strain and stress distributions in endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with different post, core and crown materials. Dent Mat 2007;(23): 983-993.
  20. Influence of different post designs and composition on stress distribution in maxillary central incisor: finite element analysis. Ind J Den Res 2009;20(2):153-158.
  21. Evaluation of different post systems: finite element method. Int J Odontostomat 2010;4(3):229-236.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.