Evaluation of Effective Dose with Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Dental Imaging Devices
Citation Information :
Evaluation of Effective Dose with Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Dental Imaging Devices. J Contemp Dent 2015; 5 (2):80-85.
Demonstration eines cancroids des rechten handruckens, das sich nach langdauernder einwirkung von rontgenstrahlen entwickelt hatte. Fortsch roentgenstr 1902; 6:106-111.
Tıbbi Görüntüleme Fiziği. Isparta: Rekmay Matbaası, Bölüm 1, 2 2003.
Radyasyon Yaralanmaları ve Korunma Yöntemleri. Sted 2002;11(7):272-274.
The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Publication 103, Ann ICRP 2007; 37(2-4):125-132.
Termoluminesans dozimetreler. Ankara Üniversitesi Nükleer Bilimler Enstitüsü Ders Notları 2008.
Methods of determining the effective dose in dental radiology. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2010;139(1-3):306-309.
The 1990 recommendations of the International commission on radiological protection. Publication 60 Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press; 1991.
A dental x-ray validation study: comparison of information from patient interviews and dental charts. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121(3):430-439.
Brain and salivary gland tumors related to prior dental radiography: implications for current practice. JADA 1990;120(2):151-158.
Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of international commission on radiological protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139(9):1237-1243.
UNSCEAR 2008 Report Vol. I: Sources of Ionizing Radiation. New York: United Nations; 2010.
Radiological protection for medical exposure to ionizing radiation. Safety Guide No: RS-G-1.5. Vienna: IAEA press; 2002.
Radiation exposure and dose evaluation in intraoral dental radiology. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2007;123(2):262-267.
Managing patient dose in digital radiology. ICRP publication 93. Ann ICRP 2004;34(1):1-73.
Evaluating phantom image quality parameters to optimise patient radiation dose in dental digital radiology. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2012;151(1):95-101.
Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography. Eur J Radiol 2009;71(1):42-48.
Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: patient exposure. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005;34(3): 145-149.
(31.10.2010). Radiation protection: cone beam ct for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Provisional guidelines. A report prepared by the sedentexct project. Accessed at: [http://www.sedentexct.eu ]. Accessed on: 12.06.2012.
Cone-beam computerized tomography imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38(6):609-625.
Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 2009;71(3):461-468.
Comparison of effective dose for imaging of mandible between multi-detector ct and cone-beam ct. Imaging Science in Dentistry 2012;42(2):65-70.
Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107(4):559-565.
Effective dose and risk assessment from film tomography used for dental implant diagnostics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994;23(3): 123-127.
Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35(4):219-226.
Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357(22):2277–2284.
Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States (Report No. 160). Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 2009.
Comparative dosimetry of dental cbct devices and 64 row ct for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008b;106(1):930-938.
Radiation dose in dental radiology. Eur Radiol 2002;12(3):634-637.
