Journal of Contemporary Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparison of the Accuracy of Apex Locators with Conventional Techniques in determining the Root Canal Length in Primary Teeth

Naveen Kumar Kommineni, P Prathyusha Simha, Vinay Chand Reddy, C Lalitha Samyuktha, Prashanth M Battepati

Citation Information : Kommineni NK, Simha PP, Reddy VC, Samyuktha CL, Battepati PM. Comparison of the Accuracy of Apex Locators with Conventional Techniques in determining the Root Canal Length in Primary Teeth. J Contemp Dent 2015; 5 (2):61-64.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10031-1108

License: CC BY-ND 3.0

Published Online: 01-08-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; The Author(s).


Abstract

PDF Share
  1. Accuracy of 2 different apex locators in primary teeth with and without root resorption. Clin Oral Investig 2008;12(2):137-141.
  2. Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy of 2 electronic apex locators during root canal length determination in primary teeth. Int Endod J 2008;41(4):317-321.
  3. Clinical evaluation of the measuring accuracy of Root ZX in primary teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95(1): 94-100.
  4. Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and young permanent tooth. Pediatr Dent 2004;26(7):115-119.
  5. An in vitro comparison of the three endodontic techniques for primary incisors. Pediatr dent 1993;15(4):254-256.
  6. In vitro measurement accuracy of an electronic apex locator in teeth with simulated apical root resorption. J Endod 2002;28(6):461-463.
  7. Lengths and distortion in root canal measurements of upper premolars and upper and lower molars. RGO 1988;36(2):97-98.
  8. Ex vivo accuracy of three electronic apex locators: root ZX, elements diagnostic unit and apex locator and ProPex. Int Endod J 2006;39(5):408-414.
  9. Radiovisiography: an initial evaluation. Br Dent J 1990;168(6):244-248.
  10. Experimental study on iontophorosis. J Jpn Stomatol 1942;16:411-429.
  11. New method for measuring the length of the root canal. J Dent Res 1962;41:375-387.
  12. A comparative evaluation of electronic and radiographic determination of root canal length in primary teeth: an in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent 2012 Oct-Dec;3(4):416-420.
  13. Ex vivo performance of five methods for root canal length determination in primary anterior teeth. Int Endod J 2010;43(2):142-147.
  14. Digital versus conventional radiography for determination of primary incisor length. Braz J Oral Sci 2009 Apr-Jun;8(2):101-104.
  15. Williams KB, Spencer P. Radiographic endodontic working length estimation: comparison of three digital image receptors. Oral surg Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106(4):604-608.
  16. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of two electronic apexlocators. J Conserv Dent 2008;11(2):82-85.
  17. Electronic apex locator: a useful tool for root canal treatment in the primary dentition. ASDC J Dent Child 1996;63(6):414-417.
  18. An in vitro comparison of root canal measurement in primary teeth. J Ind Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2005;23:124-125.
  19. Primary tooth length determination in direct digital radiography: an in vivo study. Pediatr Dent 2007;29:470-474.
  20. Accuracy of apex locators for root canal length determination of deciduous molars compared to conventional radiograph. J Interdisciplinary Dentist 2013 Sep-Dec;3(3):163-166.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.