Journal of Contemporary Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2013 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Conventional Flap Surgery for Treatment of Intrabony Periodontal Defects: A Pilot Case Controlled Study

Stephen K Harrel, Celeste M Abraham, Francisco Rivera-Hidalgo, Matthew R Steffer, Jeffrey A Rossmann, David G Kerns, Ibtisam Al-Hashimi, Eric S Solomon, Daisha J Cipher

Citation Information : Harrel SK, Abraham CM, Rivera-Hidalgo F, Steffer MR, Rossmann JA, Kerns DG, Al-Hashimi I, Solomon ES, Cipher DJ. Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Conventional Flap Surgery for Treatment of Intrabony Periodontal Defects: A Pilot Case Controlled Study. J Contemp Dent 2013; 3 (2):61-67.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10031-1038

License: CC BY-ND 3.0

Published Online: 01-08-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; The Author(s).


Abstract

PDF Share
  1. Human histologic evaluation of an intrabony defect treated with enamel matrix derivative, xenograft, and GTR. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004 Aug;24(4):326-333.
  2. Ten-year results following treatment of intra-bony defects with enamel matrix proteins and guided tissue regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 2008 Sep;35(9):817-824.
  3. A minimally invasive surgical approach for periodontal bone grafting. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998 Apr;18(2):161-169.
  4. Long-term results of a minimally invasive surgical approach for bone grafting. J Periodontol 1999 Dec;70(12):1558-1563.
  5. Prospective assessment of the use of enamel matrix proteins with minimally invasive surgery. J Periodontol 2005 Mar;76(3):380-384.
  6. Treatment of periodontal destruction associated with a cemental tear using minimally invasive surgery. J Periodontol 2000 Nov;71(11):1761-1766.
  7. Minimally invasive surgical technique and enamel matrix derivative in intra-bony defects. I: Clinical outcomes and morbidity. J Clin Periodontol 2007 Dec;34(12):1082-1088.
  8. The simplified papilla preservation flap. A novel surgical approach for the management of soft tissues in regenerative procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999 Dec;19(6):589-599.
  9. Microsurgical approach to periodontal regeneration. Initial evaluation in a case cohort. J Periodontol 2001 Apr;72(4):559-569.
  10. Single minimally invasive surgical technique with an enamel matrix derivative to treat multiple adjacent intra-bony defects: clinical outcomes and patient morbidity. J Clin Periodontol 2008 Jul;35(7):605-613.
  11. Improved wound stability with a modified minimally invasive surgical technique in the regenerative treatment of isolated interdental intrabony defects. J Clin Periodontol 2009 Feb;36(2):157-163.
  12. A comparative study of two root-coverage techniques with regard to interdental papilla dimension as a prognostic factor. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009 Apr;29(2):179-189.
  13. Minimally invasive surgical technique and enamel matrix derivative in intrabony defects: 2. Factors associated with healing outcomes. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009 Jun;29(3):257-265.
  14. A minimally invasive surgical technique with an enamel matrix derivative in the regenerative treatment of intra-bony defects: a novel approach to limit morbidity. J Clin Periodontol 2007 Jan;34(1):87-93.
  15. Clinical evaluation of demineralized freezedried bone allograft with and without enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of periodontal osseous defects in humans. J Periodontol 2008 Dec;79(12):2273-2280.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.