Journal of Contemporary Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2013 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Rehabilitation of an Edentulous Patient with Implant Supported Overdenture

Swapnali Mhatre, Janani Mahadevan, Malika Karthik

Citation Information : Mhatre S, Mahadevan J, Karthik M. Rehabilitation of an Edentulous Patient with Implant Supported Overdenture. J Contemp Dent 2013; 3 (1):52-56.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10031-1036

License: CC BY-ND 3.0

Published Online: 01-04-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; The Author(s).


Abstract

PDF Share
  1. The decade of overdentures: 1970-1980. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79(1):31-36.
  2. Peri-implant mucosal aspects of ITI implants supporting overdentures. A five-year longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:9-18.
  3. Within-subject comparisons of implantsupported mandibular prostheses: Choice of prosthesis. J Dent Res 1994;73:1105-11.
  4. Psychological response. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (Eds). Tissue integrated prostheses. Chicago: Quintessence 1985;165-74.
  5. Patient satisfaction after insertion of an osseointegrated implant bridge. J Oral Rehabil 1987;14: 481-87.
  6. Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part II-Patient satisfaction and preference. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73: 364-69.
  7. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17(4):601-02.
  8. Non-submerged osseointegrated dental implants with ball attachments supporting overdentures in patients with mandibular alveolar ridge atrophy. A short-term follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:170-74.
  9. The prosthodontic maintenance requirements of mandibular mucosa-and implant-supported overdentures: A review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13:238-43.
  10. A prospective evaluation of the fate of 697 consecutive intraoral fixtures ad modum Branemark in the rehabilitation of edentulism. J Head Neck Pathol 1987;6:53-58.
  11. A 5-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in mandibular overdenture therapy. Part I: Peri-implant outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9: 170-77.
  12. The masticatory efficiency of mandibular implant supported overdentures as compared with tooth supported over-dentures and complete dentures. J Oral Implantol 2002;28:238-43.
  13. Alveolar bone loss in overdenture: A 5-year study. J Prosthet Dent 1978;6:610-13.
  14. Periodontal aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting a partial bridge. An up to 6-years retrospective study. J Clin Periodontol 1992;19:118-26.
  15. A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:291-98.
  16. Rehabilitation of an edentulous mandible with an implant supported prosthesis. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997;9:357-70.
  17. Fabrication of a two piece superstructure for a fixed detachable implant supported mandibular complete denture. J Prosthet Dent 2000;2:205-09
  18. An alternative impression technique for implant-retained overdentures with locator attachments. J Oral Implantol 2010;34:451-53.
  19. A functional impression technique for implant supported overdenture: A clinical report. J Oral Implantol 2006;32:41-43.
  20. Photoelastic stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 1998 Nov; 80(5):559-64.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.